Illinois Child Sexual Abuse Lawyer: Why Abuse From Decades Ago Can Still Lead to a Claim Against the Institution Responsible

Most people who call about childhood sexual abuse are not children anymore. They are adults in their thirties, fifties or seventies, and many of them open the conversation the same way: "I know it's probably too late, but..." That assumption keeps a great many survivors from ever asking. In Illinois, it is frequently wrong.

A civil claim for childhood abuse does not require a police report, and it does not require that anyone was ever charged. It asks a different question than a criminal case does. It looks at whichever institution had care of the child, whether a school, church, youth program, camp or care provider, and asks what that institution knew, what it should have known and what it did.

Childhood Claims Follow Different Rules

The rules that govern a claim for abuse suffered as a child are not the same as those for abuse suffered as an adult. That difference is exactly why asking is better than assuming. Illinois law recognizes that a child could not consent, could not simply leave and usually had no safe way to report. Courts approach childhood claims with that context in mind.

What the Statute Provides

The key provision is 735 ILCS 5/13-202.2. Subsection (f) states that an action for damages based on childhood sexual abuse may be commenced at any time. Illinois is among the states that removed the civil limitation period for this kind of claim.

There is a qualification. The change applies to actions brought on or after the amendment took effect, as long as the claim was not already time-barred before that date. "No time limit" is accurate going forward, but it does not automatically revive a claim that had already expired under the earlier rule. Which side of that line a particular claim falls on depends on when the abuse happened, when the survivor turned 18 and how the older rules applied to them. That is something only a review of the facts can answer.

Who the Claim Is Usually Against

These cases typically name the institution that had the child in its care, not only the person who committed the abuse. Negligent supervision is the theory that most often carries them: the institution had a duty to watch over the child and the adults around the child, and it failed. Other theories regularly join it, and which ones fit depends on your facts rather than on a category label.

When the institution is private, the Illinois Tort Immunity rules that govern claims against public bodies do not apply in the same way, and the liability questions are the familiar institutional ones.

A Criminal Case Is Not Required

Criminal and civil cases are separate systems. A criminal case is brought by the State against a person and must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. A civil claim is brought by the survivor, usually against an institution, and uses a lower standard: what is more likely than not. A prosecutor's decision not to charge, or a criminal case that fell apart, does not decide the civil question.

Institutions Keep Records, Even Decades Later

Survivors often worry that too much time has passed for any evidence to remain. In practice, organizations that care for children tend to generate paperwork that outlives the people involved: enrollment and attendance records, staff rosters, personnel files, incident reports, correspondence with parents and minutes from board or parish meetings. Some of those documents show who was supervising whom, which complaints were made and what, if anything, was done in response. A claim built around the institution's own records does not rest entirely on one person's memory of events from childhood, and part of any review is finding out which of those records still exist.

Common Questions

I never reported it. Does that matter? No. A civil claim needs no police report, charge or conviction. Most of the people we speak with never reported, and in many institutional settings, reporting would have meant telling the abuser's own colleagues.

It happened a very long time ago. That is the norm in this work, not the exception. What governs it is your age at the time, who was responsible and the particular facts.

What does it cost to find out? Nothing up front. These cases are handled on a contingency fee, so there is no fee if there is no recovery.

What Happens When You Reach Out

Asking a question does not start anything:

  1. You speak with a person, not a form, and you do not have to describe what happened.
  2. We look into which institution was responsible, what it knew, which records still exist and whether a claim can be brought. That work costs you nothing.
  3. You get a plain answer about what is possible, and you decide. If you stop there, everything you told us stays confidential.
  4. If you go ahead, we take on filings, deadlines, records and the institution's insurers, and we can seek protection for your identity in the court record.

Contact Ervin Nevitt

Ervin Nevitt is a partner at Coplan + Crane and has been admitted to practice in Illinois since 2014. Calls to (708) 671-6858 are answered around the clock. The office is at 60 W Randolph St, Suite 333, Chicago, IL 60601, and nothing you say is shared with anyone else.

If you need someone to talk to right now, RAINN's National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-4673 is free, confidential and always open. If you are in immediate danger, call 911. A hotline call does not affect your legal options.

Attorney advertising. General information only, not legal advice.

Tammi Lievens
Tammi Lievens

Hardcore beer trailblazer. Award-winning bacon scholar. Devoted foodaholic. Unapologetic twitter lover. Proud coffee geek.